When a Federal employee is removed for failing to maintain a security clearance, the  MSPB may only review that decision to determine whether the Agency met its burden of proof that:

1) the employee’s position required a security clearance;

(2) the employee’s security clearance was denied or revoked;

(3) transfer to a non-sensitive position was not feasible; and

(4) the agency followed the procedural requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 7513 in processing the removal action

In a recent case decided by the MSPB, the full Board applied the Egan analysis applies to positions that the agency has designated as sensitive.   Crumpler v. Dept. of Defense, 2009 MSPB 224 (November 2, 2009).

No post on this website is legal advice, is meant to be legal advice, and certainly does not serve as a substitute for legal advice. Information is power, and we are providing this information to give you, the federal employee, with some power. This information is not widely or easily accessible to Federal Employees.

It is best to consult with a lawyer familiar with Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals to discuss the facts and law of your particular case. If your Agency has taken an adverse action against you based on a loss of a security clearance, contact an attorney familiar with  MSPB appeals.