MSPB & EEOC: What are Requests for Interrogatory and how does the Federal Employee use them in discovery?

By Chris Attig | Permalink
October 30th in Catch 62 Appeals (Military Service Credit Deposit), Federal Disability Retirement, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

Both the MSPB and the EEOC afford Appellants (or Complainants) the opportunity to pursue discovery.   While the timelines and the amounts of discovery allowed are quite different, the basic ideas of what discovery is and how it should be used are very similar.

There are six (6) primary types of discovery in litigation in the U.S (click [...]

MSPB & EEOC: What are Requests for Admission and how does the Federal Employee use them in discovery?

By Chris Attig | Permalink
October 6th in Catch 62 Appeals (Military Service Credit Deposit), Federal Disability Retirement, Federal Whistleblowers, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

This post is part of a continuing series describing the general discovery tools available to Federal Employees who are Appellants before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and/or Complainants before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Both the MSPB and the EEOC afford Appellants (or Complainants) the opportunity to pursue discovery.  While the timelines and the amounts of discovery allowed are quite different, the basic ideas of what discovery is and how it should be used are very similar.

There are [...]

MSPB & EEOC: What is Discovery and How can the Federal Employee use it?

By Chris Attig | Permalink
September 27th in Catch 62 Appeals (Military Service Credit Deposit), Federal Disability Retirement, Federal Whistleblowers, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

Both the MSPB and the EEOC afford Appellants (or Complainants) the opportunity to pursue discovery.   While the timelines and the amounts of discovery allowed are quite different, the basic ideas of what discovery is and how it should be used are very similar.

Discovery is a very important part of your case.  In an EEO case, you [...]

MSPB: Federal Employee Firefighters and Retirement Credit for firefighting positions

By Chris Attig | Permalink
September 27th in General Federal Employment Law Posts, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

We have been getting an increasing number of calls over the last year about firefighters in the Federal Government being denied retirement credits for time served as a firefighter.  Here are the rules, and how it works.

If you are reading this, then you know that Federal employees [...]

MSPB & EEOC: Speaking Opportunities and Presentations on Federal Employment Legal Matters

By Chris Attig | Permalink
September 19th in Catch 62 Appeals (Military Service Credit Deposit), Federal Disability Retirement, Federal Whistleblowers, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

Your managers have training on Employment Law, why don’t the workers?

Mr. Attig is founder of the Attig Law Firm, a Firm that regularly represents Federal Employees before the EEOC, MSPB, OWCP, OPM and OWCP.  Clients, potential clients, and various employee organizations have commented on how helpful Mr. Attig’s straightforward and candid explanations of Federal Employment laws, processes, and forums have been to them.

Mr. Attig is available to come to your organization, union, workplace, or association to speak and/or train your [...]

MSPB: Probationary Federal Employees, Appeal Rights, and “Tacking”

By Chris Attig | Permalink
September 19th in General Federal Employment Law Posts, MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

Probationary employees generally have no right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).   If, however, the Federal Employee on a probationary period can raise a nonfrivolous allegation that the termination was due to marital status discrimination or partisan political reasons, they will typically be afforded an MSPB appeal and/or hearing. See Von Deneen v. Department of Transportation, 33 M.S.P.R. 420, 422, aff’d, 837 F.2d 1098 (Fed. [...]

Fed. Circuit: MSPB must give considerable weight to Mental Health conditions as mitigating factor.

By Attig Law Firm | Permalink
September 7th in MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

On August 25, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued  a decision remanding an MSPB Appellant’s case back to the MSPB for additional review.  The crux of the case, Malloy v. USPS (Fed. Circ. Docket No. 2008-3117), turns on the evidence of the Appellant’s mental health condition.

The [...]

MSPB: Removals for “Excessive Use of Leave”

By Chris Attig | Permalink
May 16th in MSPB - Adverse Action Appeals (Performance and Discipline), MSPB Appeals.

We all know that an Agency can try to remove you for being Absent Without Leave (AWOL). What if an Agency tries to remove you for taking too much approved annual leave or approved sick leave? How about if an Agency tries to remove you for taking too much Leave Without Pay? Will the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) uphold that decision?

Every case is unique, so the answers to those questions are things you should discuss [...]

Federal Disability Retirement: I’ve been approved for Social Security disability, but denied Disability retirement – what next?

By Chris Attig | Permalink
December 27th in Federal Disability Retirement, General Federal Employment Law Posts, MSPB Appeals.

I have heard from a lot of  disability retirement applicants that they have been approved for Social Security disability but later denied  disability retirement by  OPM. Many of the applicants that call us are confused how this can be, so this blog will attempt to explain how this might happen – and what you can do about it.

The biggest reason that you might receive different decisions – a grant of Social Security disability but not  FERS disability retirement (or [...]

Federal Disability Retirement: FERS/CSRS and light duty accommodations

By Chris Attig | Permalink
December 16th in Federal Disability Retirement, General Federal Employment Law Posts.

When an employee applies for disability retirement under CSRS or FERS, one of the elements that the employee must show is that the Agency is unable to accommodate him or her.

In order to prove this element, the agency must review all vacant positions under its jurisdiction at the same grade or pay level and tenure in the commuting area to determine if the employee meets the minimum qualification standards for any vacant position. [...]

 Page 3 of 7 « 1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »